
| HOW TO BE SAVED |
26 Aug |
Jesus said to Nicodemus “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” John 3:3
Romans 3:23 tells us “…all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God.”
So, what happened to man? Why do we need to be “born again”, as Jesus said? To answer these questions and to understand what being born again means, one must go back to the beginning, back to the Garden of Eden. For it is in the Garden of Eden that we see everything set in motion for mankind.
Adam and Eve were created by God and they were created to live forever. They were, in their original state, perfect and without sin. Being perfect and without sin meant that they would live forever, if, they obeyed God’s command concerning a certain tree in the Garden of Eden.
But, as we know, it didn’t take long before Adam and Eve fell to the temptation of the Devil to be “like God” and to know the difference between good and evil. They both disobeyed God and with their disobedience, sin entered into the world and sin entered into the human race. So, everyone born thereafter was born into a sinful state of existence and born with a sin nature.
With the Fall of Man in the Garden of Eden we see that sin and all of its consequences entered into the world. These consequences include sickness, disease, pain, suffering, heartache, fear, anger, depression, jealously, envy, strife and the flesh nature of man. It wasn’t supposed to be this way, but this is how it ended up. Also, with the Fall of Man, we see that Adam and Eve lost the “life connection” they had with God. Adam and Eve lost their eternal life, and now one day they would die. But, there was still hope.
A note at this point. For those who challenge Christianity as being the legitimate religion of the world today and challenge the origin of Christianity, it must be noted that Christianity began in the Garden of Eden at the time of the Fall of Man. It began with God’s prophecy to Adam, Eve and Satan concerning the coming Messiah who would be called Jesus. Therefore, for those skeptics, who say that Christianity is an “invention” of someone’s mind that evolved late in the overall history of mankind, that is simply an inaccurate and underdeveloped analysis. Adam and Eve were the first human beings. And, we see a Messianic prophecy introduced to Adam and Eve at the very beginning of man’s existence on the Earth, therefore, how can anyone say that Christianity “came later” than the other religions of the world. To say such a thing would mean that the other non-Christian religions of the world would have to have existed…before… Adam and Eve.
At the time of the Fall of Man in the Garden of Eden, we see a prophecy come forth concerning all that had happened and the state of sin that man now found himself. God says, at that time, these words to Satan “…And I will put enmity between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed, He shall bruise your head (tread your head underfoot) and you shall bruise His heel.” This is the first prophecy in the Bible and it is a prophecy about Jesus Christ who would be born into the world centuries later.
So, getting back to the Fall of Man. Now we see that Adam and Eve and every human being subsequently born into the world are now separated from God and have a sin problem that they have no power or ability to get rid of. And, according to God’s holiness, if a man does not get rid of his sin, he can never be in the presence of a Holy God. So, what is a man to do?
At first, in the Old Testament days, God required animal sacrifices for sin. We see in Leviticus 17:11 that God says “For the life of the flesh in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.” This is one of the most important verses in all of the Bible. The importance of which we’ll visit later.
We see that God, at first, set up a system of animal sacrifices for man’s sins. The innocent animals were having to die for the sins of men. This is the way that God set it up. You simply have to accept this reality. Our sins are unbecoming and ugly in God’s eyes, so, in turn, the “ugliness” of sacrifice was required to deal with sin.
So, finally, after many long centuries and many additional prophecies about the coming Messiah, we see in the Book of Matthew where Jesus arrives on the scene. We see Jesus being born of the Virgin named Mary into the human race. Jesus a God Man. The first ever of His type, and the last of this type. He is the Alpha and Omega, the First and the Last. Jesus was both man and God at the same time.
There is a pop song that has a line in it that goes “What if God was one of us, just trying to make it”. Well, in fact, in the person of Jesus Christ, God was one of us and…He did “make it.” Jesus did make it through all the trials and temptations of being a man without ever sinning.
Then, we see in the Bible where Jesus came to the moment of allowing Himself to be taken prisoner by the Romans guards under the authority of the Pharisees and religious leaders of the day and falsely accused of crimes against the Roman government. After a bogus trial, Jesus was beaten and then crucified on a cross where He bleed and died.
Then, on the third day after Jesus’ death, we read in the Bible where Jesus rose from the dead, appeared to many, ate food with the disciples, gave some final words of instruction and then ascended into Heaven where He sat down at the Right Hand of The Father.
So, today, as a human being, we must first recognize and accept the fact and reality that we have sin in our lives that must be forgiven. Jesus says in Mark 1:15 “Repent and believe in the gospel.” This means that we must ask God to forgive us for our sins. Now at this point, there is a newly developing debate that you need to avoid. Some are saying that it is impossible to remember all the sins you ever committed so, therefore, how can anyone ask for forgiveness for sins they can’t remember. This argument is futile and comes from the Devil and it is a device to rob men’s souls. Don’t go there.
To ask forgiveness for your sins simply means that you acknowledge before God that you are a sinner and then ask Him to forgive you of all your sins (in general) that you have ever committed. This covers all those you may have forgotten and I might add at this point, this also covers “all those sins you have committed that you didn’t even realize were sins in God’s eyes”. So, to say that any one human being could even possibly know about and categorize every sin they may or may not have ever committed would in essence make that person equal with God.
At the same moment you are asking God to forgive you of your sins, you must ask Jesus to come into your life and be your Lord and Savior. This is part of getting saved. It is the blood sacrifice of Jesus that cleanses you of your sins. And, by acknowledging Jesus as your Lord and Savior, you are saying that you accept His sacrifice for your sins. It is extremely important that you understand this. Remember the verse we looked at in Leviticus 17:11. If the “life of the flesh is in the blood” then, this means that the life of Jesus was in His blood. Jesus gave His “life” in order that you might live.
So, if you have prayed this prayer with understanding, then, you are saved. You are born again as Jesus said. It is a spiritual re-birth. Remember Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. They died spiritually on that day. That is why we must be “re-born” or born again as Jesus said. If you have said this prayer, then welcome to the family of God. Amen.
Tags: Adam and Eve, Atonement, Blood Sacrifice, Born Again, Does Hell Exist?, Forgiveness of sins, Garden of Eden, Heaven and Hell, How can I be born again?, How can I be saved?, How to be Born Again, How to be saved, Is there a Hell?, Jesus and Nicodemus, Salvation, The Cross of Jesus, What is Born Again?, What is sin?, What must a person do to be saved?, Where is Heaven?, Where is Hell?, Where was the Garden of Eden?, Why blood sacrifice?, Why should I be saved?
read comments (0)| THE NEW “1611 KJV” CULT OF ETERNAL SECURITY |
16 Aug |
We read in Luke 13:3-5 where Jesus says “…unless you repent, you will all likewise perish”. Next, we read in I John 1:9 which says “…If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins”. Finally, we read in Acts 3:19 where a person must “…repent therefore and be converted”.
By the above scriptures we see that repenting of one’s sins is necessary for salvation. You cannot be saved unless you repent to God for your sins. You will not go to Heaven unless your sins are forgiven. Jesus offers us that forgiveness through and by His blood sacrifice on the cross. This is the gospel message.
Unfortunately, a new group has emerged on the scene and this group is saying that the concept of asking God to forgive you of your sins is a “works” gospel. They are even saying that the tried and true, old-fashioned alter calls for salvation are “demonic” because in their words “it is works oriented”. They are saying in simple terms that the idea of repenting involves an “action” or “effort” on our part and therefore somehow means that we are “working to earn” our salvation vs accepting salvation as a free gift. This may sound unbelievable but, it is true.
This same group is saying that simply having “faith” that Jesus exists is what saves the soul. They quote many verses about simply “believing on the Lord” and they say that the idea that you have to do anything to be saved (including asking forgiveness for your sins) is a doctrine of works and therefore wrong.
This same group is placing an inordinate emphasis on the 1611 King James Bible. There are videos on You Tube of various ministers of this group who are ripping apart and throwing the NIV Bible on the floor as they preach in order to emphasize their point that the NIV is “demonic” as compared to the 1611 KJV.
This group is so adamant about their belief that Christians should only use the 1611 KJV that it is cultish. It almost seems as if they are worshipping the 1611 KJV Bible, rather than the God and Savior that the Bible speaks of. They seem to be worshipping the ink and paper of the 1611 KJV Bible rather than Jesus Christ that the pages and words talk about. One could say that a new “1611 KJV Cult” has emerged within the ranks of Christianity.
This group leaves absolutely no room whatsoever for the Holy Spirit to operate in the life of the believer today. They relegate the Holy Spirit to a “retired status” theologically as though His work is complete and that His power and presence is no longer necessary. This group believes that I Corinthians 13:10 is referring to the canonized 1611 KJV of the Bible. Go to You Tube, type in Spiritual Retardation and Speaking in Tongues pt2 and drop down to the comments section and see for yourself that this is, in fact, what they believe. While you’re at it, also type in Pentecostal Speaking in Tongues = Being Demon Possessed and see what is transpiring with this group.
This group is also adamant about the doctrine of “Eternal Security”. In other words, they believe that once a person is saved, then, that person’s spiritual status can never change. Never change no matter what that person may do, get involved in, or even believe, after they have been saved or, in their words “expressed their faith in Jesus”. They do not believe that a person can fall away from the faith as is clearly described and warned about in Hebrews chapter 6.
Speaking of their emphasis of “having faith”, it seems that, according the 1611 KJV group that even “expressing” faith in Jesus would be a form of “action” and therefore could be considered “works”. In other words, just to exercise one’s mind and simply “think” that Jesus exists would be a “works salvation”.
Let’s look further into the emphasis on the 1611 KJV. If someone is going to say that we must only follow the 1611 KJV because it is the “original version” of the Bible, then, logically, if you are going to follow that track of reasoning then, one would have to continue and say “but wait, where did the writings or material or manuscripts from which the KJV was derived come from”? Perhaps, going back to those writings would be the more sure way of theological accuracy. Perhaps, the early century Catholics had it right when they believed that the scriptures should be kept in and only read in Latin. So, that would make the Latin Vulgate the true source of scriptural authority. But, then what about the old Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. Or wait, what about the language that Jesus spoke in, was it a now-extinct form of Aramaic? If so, we’re now all in trouble, because no one living today could ever translate such a language, and adding to this dilemma is the fact that such manuscripts don’t exist. And, we are not finished. If you are going to say that we have to establish the authority of the language, or the original language in which scriptures were written, then one has to ask the question: “What language did Adam and Eve speak in?” This would be the source of true written and recorded scriptural authority. I mean, if anyone could “take us to school” about knowing God, understanding the nature and character of God, what works with God, and most definitely what does not work with God, it would have been Adam and Eve. Indeed. Only one problem. No one knows what language Adam and Eve spoke in and there are certainly no manuscripts written by Adam and Eve in our bookshelf.
The only way out of this dilemma is to be led by the Holy Spirit. We allow the Holy Spirit to bear witness in our hearts as to what is true or not true, as to what is of God and what is not of God, as to what we should believe is the true record and what is not genuine and inspired by God. Only by the Holy Spirit can this be done.
Furthermore, to say that I Corinthians 13:10 is talking about the 1611 KJV, and that with the canonization of the 1611 KJV all gifts of the spirit ceased to operate is totally illogical and cannot be supported theologically. One quick question here that immediately pops into mind is if the 1611 KJV is what I Corinthians 13:10 is talking about, and if the gifts of the spirit ceased with the fulfillment of I Corinthians 13:10, and also, as this group believes, if the gifts of the spirit were dispensational and operated only in the time of the early 1st Century church, then, what about the 1500 year gap between the 1st Century and 1611? What was the status of the gifts for this time period? For that matter, I would like to ask if this group believes anyone could have been “saved” between 100 A.D. and 1611 A.D.?
It seems these fellows are painting themselves into a theological corner. This new emerging group is a cult.
Finally, on the question of Eternal Security which is also known as “Once Saved, Always Saved”, I have this observation. The life that Jesus offers us through His blood sacrifice is a covenant. It is known as the New Covenant or New Testament. And, our relationship, as a body of believers to Jesus is described, even by Him, as that of a marriage. So, to use the very analogy of Jesus, if we today, are going to say “Once Saved, Always Saved”, then, one would also have to say “Once Married, Always Married”.
So, you are thinking of how many examples why you simply cannot say that. You cannot say of a marriage today “Once Married, Always Married”. It would be utter foolishness to speak in such terms, knowing that so many failed marriages in our society today are proof enough that you cannot make such a proclamation as a fact. So, just the same, to say “Once Saved, Always Saved” does not hold water theologically.
Sure enough, the New Covenant written in the Blood of Christ will stand forever. The New Covenant in Jesus Christ is established forever and cannot be altered, changed or negotiated. We, as human beings, have the choice to join in this New Covenant with Jesus and accept His sacrifice for our sins. And, we also, just as in a marriage covenant, have the prerogative and free will to “walk away” from such covenant if we choose. We can walk away from our covenant with Jesus and simply say we don’t want to be in the relationship anymore. It is the human choice that “breaks” the covenant with Jesus, for Jesus would never break covenant with us, so long as we desired His companionship.
The problem with “Once Saved, Always Saved” or “Eternal Security” is that it takes away or bypasses the free will of man. It is almost as if you don’t have a choice in the matter to begin with and that, once in the relationship, you cannot make the choice to “get out of it”. This is totally illogical and it cannot hold water theologically. It simply doesn’t work. And, then, to make matters worse, if someone does walk away from their relationship with Jesus and falls away, the 1611 KJV group says “well, they weren’t saved in the first place”. To say this would be like seeing a couple get married, stay married for 10 years, have several children, live under the same roof and pay taxes together for 10 years, then, get a divorce. And, upon getting a divorce someone would say of this same couple “well, they weren’t married in the first place”. That would be illogical you say. That would not be true you say. Exactly. Just as the fallacy of the doctrine of Eternal Security is not true.
There is a vagueness about what those who promote Eternal Security really believe. They say that once a person is saved, then that person’s state of “being saved” can never change. Even if this same person goes out and sins and participates in things like stealing, lying, getting drunk, doing drugs, participating in violence towards others etc. In the theology of Eternal Security, once you are saved, you cannot sin again. That’s right. This is the pulse beat of this doctrine. For you see, if once you have been saved, and God has said that your salvation can never be lost, then, it would be impossible for such person to do anything that God would look upon as sin. For if such a Christian person did do something that was sinful in God’s eyes, then, that person would have to ask forgiveness for that sin. But, in the view of those who believe in Eternal Security, it is impossible for the Christian to ever sin again and thus place his or her soul in jeopardy. Therefore, what they are really saying is that once a person is “saved”, then even if this same person participates in what most would consider “sinful” behavior, God does not consider it sin anymore for this person because to do so God would be contradicting Himself, because in order for God to deal with this person’s sin, He would have to forgive this person who is supposed to be “eternally secure”.
In reality the doctrine of Eternal Security or Once Saved, Always Saved is, in fact, a license to sin. And, there is an escape device in this theology. Let’s say such Christian really gets “out there” in their sinful behavior and really walks away from the Christian faith. The answer to such a scenario given by the Eternal Security folks is “well, he wasn’t saved to begin with”.
So, you can see how this doctrine works. It is not too much dissimilar to the modalist doctrine which says that “a Christian’s body is separate from his spirit; therefore, what one does with their body does not affect their spirit man”. Again, this is a license to sin. For to believe this way, a Christian is not accountable for any behavior either good or bad. So, this is how the Eternal Security folks are able to believe that once saved, always saved because once saved, you can no longer sin in God’s eyes. It is a heresy.
Mark 1:15 – Jesus said “…The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand. Repent, and believe in the gospel.”
Tags: 1611 KJV, Adam and Eve, Alexandrian Text, Ancient Biblical Manuscripts, Backslidding, Biblical Translations, Can a Christian lose salvation?, Do you need to repent to be saved?, Doctrine of Eternal Security, Greek Manuscripts, Hebrew Manuscripts, Is repentance necessary for salvation?, King James Version, Latin Vulgate, Most accurate translation of the Bible, Nestle Aland Text, NIV vs KJV, Once Saved Always Saved, Repent, Repentance and Salvation, Saved by Faith, Saved by Works, Steven L Anderson, Translation inaccuracies of the Bible, Versions of the Bible, What language did Jesus speak?, Works Salvation

